Java + Node REST 缓存插入测试
ab -A username:password -u restput.txt -n 1000 -c 1 https://server/ctispan/rest/key/111 > results.txt restput.txt value=test111 |
Java SOAP 缓存获取测试
ab -A client:password -T "application/soap+xml; charset=UTF-8" -p soapget.xml -n 1000 -c 1 https://server/ctispan/services/CacheProxyWS.CacheProxyWSHttpSoap11Endpoint/ > results.txt soapget.xml <?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope"><soapenv:Body><ns1:getValue xmlns:ns1="http://server.ctispan.jwisoft.com"><ns1:key>111</ns1:key></ns1:getValue></soapenv:Body></soapenv:Envelope> |
Java SOAP 缓存插入测试
ab -A client:password -T "application/soap+xml; charset=UTF-8" -p soapput.xml -n 1000 -c 1 https://server/ctispan/services/CacheProxyWS.CacheProxyWSHttpSoap11Endpoint/ > results.txt soapput.xml <?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope"><soapenv:Body><ns1:putValue xmlns:ns1="http://server.ctispan.jwisoft.com"><ns1:key>111</ns1:key><ns1:value>text111</ns1:value></ns1:putValue></soapenv:Body></soapenv:Envelope> |
结论
下面A/B测试生成的一些数据。对于Node对比Java的结果，我并不吃惊。不过对于Java REST和SOAP的对比让我稍微有些吃惊。我原本以为因为SOAP的复杂性，REST的性能应该比SOAP好很多才对。这也许是因为Apache Axis2 API要比Jersey API高效的多造成的吧。
